What's the role of the secondary legislation?
A number of pieces of secondary legislation (Regulations) are now in place to deal with particular aspects of the Act and its implementation.
These principally concern commencement and transition, and also deal extensively with the "machinery" around the Act – providing the detail on matters such as the precise contents of the numerous transparency notices that authorities must publish in connection with procurements and procured contracts.
Other aspects covered by the secondary legislation include: the governance of the new Central Digital Platform (including what happens if a supplier can't register details because the platform is not working); the sharing of core supplier information through the Central Digital Platform; the contents of assessment summaries; the list of light-touch and reservable light-touch service types; the list of central government contracting authorities; and the disapplication of the Act in relation to regulated health procurement in England (which, since 1 January 2024, has been covered by the NHS Provider Selection regime – a separate code of rules tailored specifically for NHS purchasing).
How will you navigate the new procurement regime?
The Act brings with it a significant number of new rules, some of which apply even before a procurement gets underway, and others during the lifecycle of a procured public contract. As such, the Act's reach extends well beyond that of the existing procurement regime in a number of ways.
Authorities will need to be fully geared up for the Act to bite, beginning at the very earliest stages of their pre-procurement planning. The enhanced transparency requirements, fulfilled through the publication of the numerous new types of notice, will represent a new normal. However, the quid pro quo is the significantly greater flexibility that the Act will afford them in terms of how procurements can be conducted – notably, through the introduction of the new competitive flexible procedure. That will allow authorities to build into their procurement features such as benchmarking and competitive R&D, and to test and evaluate innovation.
The best approach for authorities, therefore, is to embrace the Act, and not be intimidated by it – instead, to take advantage of the flexibility and to accept that with it comes the need for accountability, good decision-making, and proper record-keeping.
The new Central Digital Platform will give suppliers, other stakeholders and, indeed, the public much more data on: how public money is spent; what it is being spent on; who is spending it; how much contracts are costing; how they are being performed and whether there are quality issues; whether contracts are undergoing mid-life changes and, if so, how; what contracts are being directly awarded without competition; whether suppliers are being paid promptly; whether procurements are being terminated without any contract awarded and, if so, why; and more. Authorities will be able to observe voluntary standstill periods in some situations (as well as having to observe mandatory standstills in others) to manage and mitigate any risk of challenge.
It is worth reminding ourselves that the Act's transparency requirements will, over time, start to reap rewards for authorities too. Yes, the machinery of the Act will surely underline accountability by forcing authorities to be transparent about what they are doing. Equally, the Central Digital Platform should ultimately play host to a significant body of data about current and past procurements, allowing authorities to see what other authorities are doing. If a particular authority wants to procure something which is perhaps a little niche, it could find that another authority is procuring something similar elsewhere – and thereby share ideas and learnings. Potentially, this could save them much time, resource and cost. These incoming changes are set to have a significant impact on the procurement regime.