Gordon Bell
Partner
Head of International Arbitration
Article
6
Following hot on the heels of SIAC and SCC, the ICC has become the latest arbitral institution to promote a summary procedure for the swift dismissal of unmeritorious claims in arbitrations under its rules.
In its recently updated Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on the Conduct of the Arbitration under the ICC Rules of Arbitration (the "Note"), the ICC makes clear (in Section VI (C)) that, under its rules, tribunals have the power to determine "manifestly unmeritorious claims or defenses on an expedited basis" - i.e. to adopt a summary procedure for the early dismissal of hopeless claims.
Article 22 of the ICC Rules provides that "the arbitral tribunal and the parties shall make every effort to conduct the arbitration in an expeditious and cost-effective manner, having regard to the complexity and value of the dispute" and gives the tribunal the ability to adopt "such procedural measures as it considers appropriate, provided that they are not contrary to any agreement of the parties".
The Note explains that the broad scope of Article 22 encompasses applications "for the expeditious determination of manifestly unmeritorious claims or defenses". It also provides that any party may apply for "expeditious determination" of claims or defences which have been advanced, on the grounds that they are "manifestly devoid of merit or fall manifestly outside the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction". In terms of procedure for such applications, the Note provides the following guidance:
Summary procedures in arbitration have received renewed focus recently, with SIAC and SCC both introducing express procedures into the latest editions of their rules, in August 2016 and January 2017 respectively. The ICC's approach is somewhat different - although it updated its own rules in March 2017, it did not include an express summary determination provision. What is clear from the Note though is that the ICC Court considers this a power which has nonetheless been available to tribunals under its rules for some time.
That the ICC has felt it necessary to highlight the availability of summary procedures is interesting. It suggests that tribunals have been reluctant to adopt such procedures in arbitrations to date or that parties have simply been reluctant to make applications, which is perhaps surprising given that there are many manifestly bad claims brought to arbitration. There may have been a concern on the part of the tribunal to use the summary procedures on the basis that a party might later argue it was not given a reasonable or fair opportunity to present its case, and that this might constitute grounds for having an award set aside or challenged at enforcement.
The ICC's confirmation that tribunals have the power to adopt summary procedures to dismiss claims should at least give tribunals the confidence to adopt them where appropriate (and give parties the confidence to apply for them), leading to time and cost savings and increasing the efficiency of proceedings. The fact that any such summary decisions - if made by an award - will also be subjected to the scrutiny of the ICC Court is an important check which should give applicants comfort, and deter to some extent subsequent challenges to awards made on a summary basis.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.