Fadi Amine

Representative Work

Product Liability, Environmental & Mass Tort Class Actions

• Durand v. Honeywell Limited et al. (500-06-000760-153): Defence of a multinational product manufacturer in a product liability and environmental class action alleging consumer misrepresentations and damages to Québec residents.
• Ouellet v. Rail World, Inc. (480-06-0000010132): Defence of the owner of railway tank cars in a product liability and environmental class action arising from the Lac-Mégantic train derailment, involving 47 fatalities, destruction of the town centre, and widespread environmental contamination.
• Belmamoun c. Ville de Brossard (505-06-000019-138): Defence of a municipality in an environmental liability class action brought by residents.
• Halpern v. BSH Household Appliances Limited et al. (500-06-000488-094): Defence of three multinational manufacturers in a consumer product liability class action.
• Mastrocesare v. BSH Household Appliances Limited et al. (500-06-000488-094): Defence of three multinational manufacturers in a consumer product liability class action.
• Giard v. 3M Company et al. (500-06-001320-247): Defence of multinational product manufacturers in PFAS (“forever chemicals”) environmental class actions.
• Muskoday First Nation v. 3M Company et al. (CI04-01-U7879): Defence of multinational product manufacturers in PFAS-related environmental litigation.
• S.C. c. Gameloft SE et al. (200-06-000269-251): Defense of a mobile game manufacturer in a consumer product liability class action.

Pharmaceutical & Opioid Crisis Litigation (Canada-wide)

• Gebien v. Apotex Inc. et al. (CV-19-00620048-00CP – Ontario): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in opioid-related product liability class actions.
• British Columbia v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al. (S189395): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in opioid litigation initiated by the Province of British Columbia.
• Bourassa c. Abbott Laboratories, Limited (500-06-001004-197 – Québec): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer and distributor in opioid-related product liability class actions.
• Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. (QB72121 – Saskatchewan): Defence of pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors in opioid litigation.
• City of Grande Prairie et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al. (2001-07073 – Alberta): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in opioid-related litigation.
• Parker v. Laboratorios León Farma & Apotex Inc. (500-06-000666-137 – Québec): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in a product liability class action.
• Lyttle v. Sandoz Canada Inc. et al. (S215477 – British Columbia): Defence of a pharmaceutical manufacturer in a pharmaceutical product liability class action.

Competition Law, Pricing & Consumer Protection Class Actions

Online Ticketing & Drip Pricing

• Mihoubi v. Priceline.com et al. (500-06-001041-207): Defence of multinational online ticketing platforms against allegations of drip pricing and misrepresentations under the Competition Act and Consumer Protection Act.
• Patterson v. Ticketmaster Canada Holdings et al. (500-06-001066-204): Defence of a multinational online ticketing platform in a consumer class action involving drip-pricing allegations.
• Abihsira v. Razorgator, Inc. et al. (500-06-000754-156): Defence of a multinational online ticket platform in consumer protection and competition litigation.
• Desjardins v. Internet Referral Services (Tickets-Center.com) et al. (500-06-001072-202): Defence of a multinational ticketing platform in class actions alleging drip pricing and consumer misrepresentations.

Fuel, Manufacturing & Retail Pricing

• Thouin c. Énergie Valéro inc. et al. (200-06-000135-114): Defence of an oil and gas distributor and retailer in a price-fixing class action under competition and consumer protection legislation.
• Thibault c. Ultramar inc. et al. (500-06-000439-089): Defence of an oil and gas distributor and retailer in alleged pump price-fixing litigation.
• Jacques c. Imperial Oil Ltd. et al. (200-06-000102-080): Defence of an oil and gas distributor and retailer in price-fixing class actions.
• Cloutier c. USG Corporation et al. (200-06-000167-133): Defence of multinational drywall manufacturers in alleged price-fixing litigation.
• Badamshin & Option Consommateurs v. Panasonic Corporation (500-06-000703-146): Defence of multinational capacitor manufacturers in alleged international anti-competitive price-fixing schemes.

Consumer, Automotive & Commercial Misrepresentation Class Actions

• Lieberman v. Upper Deck et al. (500-06-001326-244): Defence of a sports trading card manufacturer in consumer misrepresentation claims.
• Bernier v. Cartier Chevrolet Buick GMC Ltée et al. (505-06-000028-212): Defence of an automotive retailer in consumer protection litigation.
• Valiquette v. Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. et al. (505-06-000029-228): Defence of an automotive retailer and a motorcycle manufacturer in alleged misrepresentation claims.
• Perry‑Fagant et al. v. MBEC Communications Inc. (UPS Store) (500-06-001277-231): Defence of a master franchisor in consumer class actions alleging price misrepresentations.

Institutional & Sensitive Class Actions

• J.J. c. Oratoire Saint‑Joseph du Mont‑Royal et al. (500-06-000673-133): Defence of Catholic dioceses and episcopal corporations in class actions alleging historic misconduct.
• Dancause v. L’Évêque catholique romain de Saint‑Jérôme–Mont‑Laurier (700-02-000015-232): Defence of a Catholic diocese in sensitive institutional liability class actions.
• A.B. c. Congrégation du très Saint Rédempteur Province du Canada & Les Rédemptoristes (200-06-000001-266): Defence of a Catholic religious order in sensitive institutional liability class actions.