Cyrus Reporter
Partner
Article
6
This article appears in our 2026 Defence Outlook guide, which explores the key trends shaping Canada’s aerospace and defence sectors. Read the full outlook and download our guide here.
On February 17, 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (“the Strategy”), a foundational policy framework that links Canada’s national defence, economic security, and industrial growth. The Strategy is grounded in the government’s view that Canada’s sovereignty, military readiness, and long-term economic prosperity increasingly depend on a strong domestic defence industrial and technological base.A central theme of the Strategy is that defence capability and economic strength reinforce one another.[1] Defence investment is framed not only as essential to equipping and sustaining the Canadian Armed Forces, but also as a catalyst for productivity, innovation, high-value job creation, and supply-chain resilience. In this context, defence procurement is treated as a long-term industrial signal rather than a series of individual investments.
The Strategy sets out clear results the government intends to achieve over the next decade, including:
These outcomes are supported by projected investments of approximately $180 billion in defence procurement, $290 billion in defence-related capital investment, and $125 billion in downstream economic benefits by 2035, amounting to more than half a trillion dollars in total economic impact to the Canadian economy.
To deliver these results, the Strategy is structured around five key pillars:
Under this pillar, the government commits to fundamentally changing how it works with Canadian defence companies.[2] Industry is positioned as a long-term partner in building and sustaining the Canadian Armed Forces, rather than as a transactional supplier responding to individual procurements. The Strategy acknowledges that past procurement approaches created uncertainty, discouraged investment, and limited the ability of Canadian firms to scale.
The government signals an intention to provide clearer and more predictable demand signals, earlier engagement with industry, and reduced regulatory burden, particularly for small- and medium-sized enterprises. This pillar is closely tied to the creation of new institutions and engagement mechanisms intended to normalize ongoing dialogue between government and industry.
Key commitments under the Strategy:
This pillar introduces the most consequential shift in defence procurement policy by formalizing Build–Partner–Buy as the governing framework for all future defence acquisitions.[3] Under this approach, Canada will first build domestically where it has existing strength or where a capability is deemed essential to preserving Canada’s sovereignty, prioritizing Canadian firms, manufacturing, and intellectual property (IP).
Where domestic capacity does not yet exist or where collaboration offers strategic advantage, Canada will partner with trusted allies through co-development, joint production, or shared sustainment arrangements. Only where neither domestic build nor partnership is feasible will Canada buy from allies, and then subject to conditions designed to ensure reinvestment in Canada, long-term sustainment capability, and sovereign control over operations and critical technologies.
Key commitments under the Strategy:
This pillar reflects the government’s view that future defence capability will be driven by innovation in areas such as artificial intelligence, cyber, quantum, space, uncrewed systems, and advanced manufacturing.[5] The Strategy emphasizes the need to better align Canada’s research ecosystem with defence priorities and to accelerate the transition from research to deployable capability.
Commercialization, scale-up, and export readiness are the government’s central themes. The Strategy also treats intellectual property as a strategic asset, with a clear preference for Canadian ownership and sovereign access to defence-related IP.
Key commitments under the Strategy:
This pillar positions supply-chain resilience as a national security imperative.[6] The Strategy highlights the risks posed by global supply disruptions and foreign dependence for critical materials, components, and energetic inputs, and commits to rebuilding domestic production capacity in priority areas. Workforce availability is also addressed as a supply-chain issue, with explicit links between industrial growth, skills development, and labour mobility.
Key commitments under the Strategy:
The final pillar emphasizes that defence industrial growth requires a whole-of-country approach. The Strategy commits to closer coordination with provinces, territories, and Indigenous rights holders to align defence infrastructure, workforce development, and industrial investment. Significant emphasis is placed on Canada’s North and Arctic, where defence investments are framed as both security necessities and economic development opportunities, especially through dual-use infrastructure.[7]
This aligns with the goals set out in the Arctic Foreign Policy, released in December 2024, as highlighted in our Defence Forecast 2025.
Key commitments under the Strategy:
The Defence Industrial Strategy marks a decisive shift from policy intent to operational execution. The government’s stated aim is for defence procurement and investment decisions to be more centralized, more deliberate, quicker, and more closely aligned with long-term industrial objectives. Domestic capability, sovereign control over critical technologies, supply-chain resilience, and workforce readiness are expected to play a far more prominent role in how procurements are designed, evaluated, and awarded.
For defence, aerospace, and dual-use technology companies, the Strategy presents a valuable roadmap on how to strengthen their relationship with government. Firms that are positioned to build in Canada will be best placed to benefit. How companies align their investment, governance, and growth strategies with these priorities will shape access to opportunities as the Strategy moves from commitment to implementation over the coming decade.
[1] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 5–9.
[2] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 11.
[3] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 13.
[4] Read more on this point in “Industrial and Technological Benefits Policy: What defence suppliers should be watching” by J. Suri and P. Pilote.
[5] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 23.
[6] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 32.
[7] Government of Canada, Security, Sovereignty and Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (February 2026), pp. 36.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.
Gowling WLG is an international law firm comprising the members of Gowling WLG International Limited, an English Company Limited by Guarantee, and their respective affiliates. Each member and affiliate is an autonomous and independent entity. Gowling WLG International Limited promotes, facilitates and co-ordinates the activities of its members but does not itself provide services to clients. Our structure is explained in more detail on our Legal Information page.
© 2026 Gowling WLG All rights reserved.