Jason Coates
Partner
Article
HMRC has issued new guidance on VAT on pension scheme costs. Is it now time for employers and trustees to make a decision?
Employers may need to take action in order to maximise VAT recovery in relation to pension scheme costs. This article outlines the latest developments, sets out the structures that are available to employers and provides next steps for anyone engaging with this issue.
The PPG litigation caused HMRC to change its approach to the VAT treatment of investment services relating to occupational pension schemes.
For a transitional period, employers have been able to rely on the old (pre-PPG) HMRC practice. This transitional period ends on 31 December 2017.
HMRC's public statements on its post-PPG position have caused much confusion and uncertainty, but new pages published in its internal manual appear to give us as many answers as we are likely to get.
Employers will (it now seems) be able to continue with the pre-PPG arrangements after the end of the transitional period, but if they want to maximise their VAT recovery, they should consider whether any of the other available structures would work better for them.
In the four years since it was decided, the European court case of PPG has caused uncertainty over employers' ability to recover VAT on investment services relating to occupational pension schemes.
This is particularly an issue for defined benefit pension schemes - defined contribution schemes have been helped by separate litigation which has established that, in most situations, services provided to them are exempt from VAT.
At first, it appeared that the PPG case would result in greater VAT recovery being available, as it established that HMRC's practice of distinguishing between:
was not legally justified.
However, HMRC responded by observing that VAT relating to investment services would only be recoverable by employers if they are the recipient of the services (i.e. they need to be a party to the contract between the trustees and the supplier). This raised the prospect of tripartite contracts - i.e. employers being added as a third party to the contracts between trustees and their suppliers.
That, and the series of HMRC briefs on the topic, has caused confusion and uncertainty in the pensions industry. Fortunately, HMRC also allowed a transitional period in which employers could continue to rely on the pre-PPG guidance. Therefore, many employers continue to observe the investment/administration distinction, and the HMRC practice of allowing invoices which combined both to be deemed to be split 70%-30% (iH.e. employers could generally assume that 30% related to administration and recover the VAT on that element).
This transitional period ends on 31 December 2017.
There has been no public announcement, but HMRC has added pages on the topic to its VAT Input Tax manual. This is ostensibly an internal manual for HMRC staff, but, like other such manuals, it is published on the HMRC website and used as much by practitioners as by HMRC itself.
There are two key points:
In summary, those structures are:
Our previous analysis set out more detail on these structures.
The new guidance is available on pages VIT44600 and VIT45400-45510 of the VAT Input Tax manual, which is available online.
Employers now have a choice - they can either:
Tripartite contracts may not be a suitable solution for most employers, although so far as investment services are concerned, they may be the only route by which employers can recover VAT in full. One of the main issues still seems to be that if an employer pays a supplier directly under a tripartite contract, this may cost them the ability to deduct the payment for corporation tax purposes (because it would no longer count as a contribution to the pension scheme). However, for employers that do wish to use them, the new manual page sets out HMRC's minimum expectations of what the contract needs to cover.
The other structures do not involve tripartite contracts. If the employer operates a VAT group, bringing the trustees within it so that at least some of the trustees' VAT can be recovered is a potentially attractive solution, and avoids the corporation tax risk.
If that solution does not work for a particular employer, the possibility of trustees making a taxable supply of pension management services to the employer, and thereby being able to recover at least some of their own VAT, is also worth exploring.
Which structure to adopt is a question on which employers need to take both tax and legal advice before making any decision. There are pros and cons with each structure, which will require bespoke advice. To maximise VAT recovery, however, it is worth asking the questions now, as we approach the end of the current transitional period.
Note: This analysis relates to defined benefit schemes only. The VAT treatment of defined contribution schemes is different in a number of respects - they are mostly exempt from VAT, if they meet the requirements to be classified as "special investment funds".
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.