Jocelyn S Paulley
Partner
Co-Head of the Retail Sector (UK)
Co-lead of Data Protection and Cyber Security sector (UK)
Article
The volume, profile and relevance of regulation around data has increased significantly in the last few years.
We've seen record fines handed out for breaches affecting millions, (TalkTalk and Yahoo), charities lambasted for wealth screening practises (which were widespread but not transparent), revelations about government monitoring and back-door access to private corporations' systems and outcries over attempts by government to create a central health database (care.data). And now we have the General Data Protection Regulation 2016 ("GDPR"), bringing major changes for data controllers and, for the first time, direct statutory obligations for data processors too.
So if you are a data centre operator or cloud service provider, how much do you need to know about all of this? After all, it's your customers' data, not yours, so you aren't responsible for it, right?
If only the world were that simple…
There's a sliding scale depending on what type of service you are providing, and how close you are to the data itself and the systems in which it resides. Those factors will determine whether any of the legislation applies to you directly. You should also be aware of legislation and industry requirements affecting your customers as well, to be able to anticipate what they will want to see from you.
In this article, the first of a two-part series, we look how GDPR applies to different types of service providers along this scale.
For the first time, the GDPR puts statutory obligations on data processors. A "processor" processes data on behalf of another (the "controller"), under the controller's instruction and direction. To "process" is very wide and covers almost anything to do with data other than pure transit. Storage and deletion are "processing".
Pure colocation operators' positions have been, and will remain, that they are not processors under GDPR. As the hardware on which data is processed is not owned by the colocation provider, they are not a processor.
Two 'buts'.
Firstly, there are some limited activities where the provider will process data. Most data centres require visitors to submit a passport or other identification to gain entry. The operator records those details in order to maintain security and will be a controller of that data. Where security guards are provided by a third party, operators will need to ensure that they have appropriate clauses in their contracts to cover this processing. CCTV over common areas of the data centre involves processing of data. Whether the operator is a controller or processor here will depend on what degree of control the operator has over the CCTV system.
Secondly, whilst operators are not processing data, the security around the data centre is part of the security ecosystem that customers will evaluate to determine whether the data is protected by "appropriate technical and organisational measures" from theft, loss, accidental disclosure. The standard required for security by the GDPR has not changed from that in the current Data Protection Act 1998. However, controllers are required to obtain "sufficient guarantees" from their processors that the processor is capable of complying with the GDPR. Whilst operators will not be processors for the vast majority of data that resides in their data centres, operators should anticipate customers asking more details questions around security and requiring more documentation of security systems, including evidence of testing and results, incident logs and certifications.
Providers of platforms within the technology stack will definitely be processors on the basis that they store data or host applications in which data resides. However, if the service is limited to providing a mere platform onto which the customer installs their own applications which carry out the actual transactions with the data, then the provider will not be a controller.
The big change for PaaS providers is that you now have direct statutory obligations as a processor, whereas previously your data protection obligations were only those flowed down in contracts by controllers. You could therefore be subject to regulatory fines for failing to comply with your obligations, in addition to contractual liabilities. Fines are substantial - up to €20million or 4% of global annual turnover (whichever is greater).
Key obligations you will need to comply with are:
If you provide access to a software application as a cloud service, you will be a processor, so everything set out above in relation to PaaS providers above is relevant, except that the nature of your services will be different. Therefore the level of assistance that you will need to give to customers relating to data subject rights and security will be higher and more involved.
Regulators have acknowledged that some service providers have a greater degree of control and freedom in how data is used in order to provide a service. These providers will actually be controllers in their own right. Sophisticated outsourcing services could fall into this bucket, or professional service providers operating in a cloud environment.
The distinction between who is a processor and who is a controller has not changed under GDPR. If you are on the borderline, now is the time to conduct a thorough analysis to determine and record why you believe you are just a processor and not a controller. The consequence of getting that wrong is a fine for failing to meet the controller's obligations, which is likely to attract fines at the higher end of the spectrum.
Controllers clearly bear the full brunt of the GDPR requirements and the principles, including accountability.
The GDPR come into force on 25 May 2018, so with just a year to go, now is definitely the time to create action plans in order to become compliant.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.