David Aylen
Consultant
IP Strategist
Article
5
This article first appeared on WTR Daily, part of World Trademark Review, in October 2019. For further information, please go to www.worldtrademarkreview.com.
On 19 September 2019 Russia's Constitutional court confirmed that the laws recognising well-known status are constitutional and valid (Case No 2145-О)
The Constitutional Court's decision stems from a complex sequence of events between the owners of the marks HORSE DOSE and HORSE SENSE (in Cyrillic). The IP Court asked the Constitutional Court to consider whether the well-known status provisions in the Civil Code are unconstitutional to the extent that those provisions allow a party to oppose an earlier registered trademark on the basis of a trademark to which well-known status has been retroactively granted to an earlier priority date.
The Constitutional Court has many powers, including the power to review whether certain laws violate the rights and freedoms of Russian citizens and, if so, to declare them unconstitutional. This was the particular concern that was raised by the IP Court.
A trademark registration had been granted to ForaPharm in Class 3 for the mark HORSE DOSE with a priority date of 3 March 2014. The opponent, Zeldis, filed two post-grant oppositions against the HORSE DOSE registration. The first opposition was based on three senior HORSE SENSE registrations in Classes 3 and 5, one of which was registration No 43077. That opposition was dismissed in 2016.
Having failed in the first opposition, Zeldis filed a second opposition. Immediately prior to doing so, Zeldis had successfully applied to Rospatent to have its registration (No 43077) acknowledged as having well-known status, retroactively to 1 March 2014 - that is, two days earlier than the 3 March 2014 priority date of the opposed application. The second opposition was successful and the HORSE DOSE registration was cancelled.
The court reviewed the question posed to it by the IP Court and concluded that the well-known status provisions in the Civil Code were valid and did not offend the Constitution.
The court's reasoning was thorough and logical:
At present, the application for HORSE DOSE stands as refused on the basis that it is confusing with registration No 43077 for HORSE SENSE in view of the fact that HORSE SENSE was accorded well-known status as of a date earlier than the priority date for the opposed application for HORSE DOSE.
The granting of well-known status is important for brand owners because it allows for protection to transcend into other classes of goods and services. It is also a powerful tool because a request allows for the grant of recognition back to a date when the mark first became well known.
This ruling thus gives a big boost to brand owners everywhere.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.