Connie Cliff
PSL Principal Associate
Article
11
On 27 March the Government amended the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) to allow carry forward of up to four weeks accrued holiday leave. This will allow leave to be taken sometime in the following two years but only where the holiday leave was not taken in this current holiday year as a result of the effects of coronavirus on the worker, the employer or the wider economy or society.
This temporary suspension of the 'no carry over' rule is welcomed. It will help to alleviate pressure on employers where workers ask to reschedule leave already booked or seek to delay booking leave as a result of social-distancing requirements, business closures and travel restrictions. Instead of insisting that workers take their full holiday entitlement in this current leave year, this amendment means that employers will be able to allow up to four weeks leave to be carried forward for up to two years.
However, while employers will be able to allow or even require carry over where it has a good coronavirus-related reason to do so, this does not mean that it must do so.
Here we consider the detail and impact of this legislative change.
Other than the ability to carry forward all or part of the four week holiday entitlement provided by regulation 13 WTR for up to two years as a result of the effects of coronavirus, the normal rules on taking annual leave under the WTR will continue to apply.
The current restriction contained in regulation 13(9)(a) WTR that prevents carry-over of any part of regulation 13 leave (four weeks) has been relaxed.
New regulations 13(10) and (11) provide that "where in any leave year it was not reasonably practicable for a worker to take some or all of the leave to which the worker was entitled under this regulation [13] as a result of the effects of coronavirus (including on the worker, the employer or the wider economy or society), the worker shall be entitled to carry forward such untaken leave" to be "taken in the two leave years immediately following the leave year in respect of which it was due."
Under new regulation 13(12), an employer may only require a worker not to take regulation 13 leave on particular days as already provided for in regulation 15(2) where the employer has good reason to do so.
The provision on payment in lieu of untaken holiday leave on termination of employment also makes it clear, that if termination takes place in one of the years into which leave was carried forward, any carried forward leave will need to be paid in full, with only the fresh holiday year entitlement for that year being subject to the pro-rata formula.
This is in effect a temporary relaxation of the prohibition of regulation 13 leave introduced in response to the effects of coronavirus. This is not limited to the impact on the individual worker's health but extends to the impact on the employer's operations or on the wider economy or society.
For example, employers will not now need to ensure that all workers take their full leave entitlement in the current leave year. Employers will not need to worry that if they allow all or the majority of their workforce to defer taking annual leave until after the current coronavirus restrictions are lifted, it will be faced with the difficulty of accommodating too many members of its workforce wanting to take holiday at the same time.
Where an employer has a good reason to do so, employers can refuse permission for leave to be taken in the current leave year. Instead leave will be carried over. Employers can also cancel previous booked holiday leave for later in the current leave year, provided they give notice that is at least as long as the holiday requested (or in accordance with a contractual provision), and they have a good reason for doing so.
Despite making a distinction regarding the potential permitted carry over period of up to two years in relation to regulation 13 leave but only one year in relation to regulation 13A/26A leave, the WTR still remain silent on the order in which the different class of holiday leave are deemed taken.
Unfortunately case law also does not provide clear assistance on determining the order in which the different classes of leave are taken (this is also important for other reasons such as what must be included in calculating the related holiday pay). Some case law points to the regulation 13 leave being deemed taken first, followed regulation 13A/26A leave and then any additional contractual leave (option 1). However, other case law unhelpfully says that an individual's holiday entitlement must be considered a "composite whole", with each day's leave consisting of entitlement under all sources taken together (option 2).
While we continue to await future expected Supreme Court guidance on this issue, some employers will have deemed order provision in their annual leave policies in accordance with option 1.
Carrying forward holiday leave from the current holiday year into the next should not present any administrative difficulties. However, if some untaken leave from the current leave year is taken into the leave year after the next leave year, so second carry over year, employers will need to keep track of the class of statutory leave being carried forward into that leave year.
Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the above.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.