John Coldham
Partner
Head of Brands and Designs (UK)
Co-leader of Retail & Leisure Sector (UK)
Article
6
Brexit will affect companies in so many different ways, it is sometimes hard to know what to focus on first. This has led the Government to criticise the business community for not being sufficiently ready, but given the uncertainty and sheer scale of change (not to mention all the other headwinds in 2020) it is understandable that businesses are finding things difficult.
Intellectual property is facing a number of changes due to Brexit, many of which will be very smooth and require little immediate work by businesses to sort. Patents are almost entirely unaffected and registered designs and trademarks will simply be cloned and reproduced on the UK register. The changes will come when you want to enforce designs or trademarks, or are still in the process of registering them. If that is you, we recommend seeking professional advice.
The real day-to-day change to the level of coverage for businesses comes with unregistered design rights. These rights are created automatically, so it is common for businesses not even to realise that they have them until they want to take action against an infringer. They are often a useful back-up option that are relied on to great effect when a product is copied. The changes caused by Brexit will narrow these automatic rights significantly, meaning businesses need to be more aware of how they are obtained, and if the new scope of protection will be sufficient.
Design law is (perhaps surprisingly) very complex, so this is a necessarily high-level overview. It really is an area in which advice should be obtained from a specialist if you want protection. Our award-winning design team is already helping a number of businesses plan ahead, but there are still some that are unaware of what is about to change. Note that the changes set out below do not affect the scope of protection of products launched before 1 January 2021.
The UK Intellectual Property Office had been seeking to agree with the EU via the proposed Free Trade Agreement that disclosures in the UK or EU should be mutually recognised. That is, if a product is first launched in London, that would count as a first disclosure for both the UK and EU versions of the three year protection. And likewise, if a product is first launched in Paris, it would obtain the UK as well as the EU version of the three year protection. This would have benefited both UK and EU businesses - without such mutual recognition, whether a business obtains UK or EU protection is most likely to depend on where the first trade show of the season is, rather than the location of the business seeking the protection.
The very latest development on this is that, disappointingly, the EU has not agreed to this, meaning that businesses still have to choose which protection they want - EU, or UK, or the three year right. This was perhaps not surprising, but will be a particular blow to businesses that rely on unregistered designs for surface decoration as part of the product, such as the fashion industry, where the sheer volume of different designs makes registration seem unworkable.
It would be a good investment of your budget to seek advice on a strategy that would work for you and your particular circumstances, but some ideas to consider include:
We are engaging with the UK Intellectual Property Office, and various stakeholder groups, to see if the UK can provide clarity on whether simultaneous disclosure is acceptable; at present it is untested, and might work, but it might not.
Clear guidance or, even better, regulation would allow businesses to have the certainty as to whether that would work. And if the UK led the way on this, it could be that the EU authorities followed suit in due course. If such guidance is not given by the Government, then businesses will have to do it and hope for the best, and find out years later in a court case whether it worked. This uncertainty can be avoided relatively easily, and we are encouraging clarity to be provided sooner rather than later.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.