Antoine Guilmain
Associé
Co-chef, Groupe national Cybersécurité et protection des données
Article
10
On February 26, 2024, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-63, the Online Harms Act, with the purpose of promoting the online safety of persons in Canada.
Bill C-63 would enact the Online Harms Act, and make amendments to the Criminal Code, the Canadian Human Rights Act and An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child pornography by persons who provide an Internet service.
Bill C-63 follows the first legislative attempt to address online harms when Bill C-36 was tabled in 2021. Bill C-36 died on the order paper in 2021 when Parliament was dissolved and an election was called. Following the 2021 general election, the government released a summary of its consultations on Bill C-36 and completed a series of further consultations with stakeholders that helped form the basis of the current Bill.
Bill C-63 targets seven categories of "harmful content":
1. Intimate content communicated without consent.
2. Content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor.
3. Content that induces a child to harm themselves.
4. Content used to bully a child.
5. Content that foments hatred.
6. Content that incites violence.
7. Content that incites violent extremism or terrorism.
The Online Harms Act, as currently proposed, would accomplish the following:
Regulated services under Bill C-63 include social media services, services with user-uploaded adult content, and live streaming services. There will be a threshold for applicability, which will be based on the number of Canadian users. The threshold would be set by regulation. Services that do not meet the threshold may also be designated by regulation. The Bill proposes four duties for regulated services:
1. A duty to act responsibly in respect of the services that they operate by taking steps such as:
2. A duty to protect children in respect of the service that it operates by:
3. A duty to make certain content inaccessible if the operator identifies on the service, content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor or intimate content communicated without consent by:
4. A duty to keep records that are necessary to determine whether the operator is complying with the operator's duties under this Act.
Bill C-63 would introduce amendments to the Criminal Code, including:
It is important to note that hatred is defined as "the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than disdain or dislike" and that an act is not motivated by hatred solely because it discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends the victim.
The Bill proposes to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act by adding provisions to facilitate complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission regarding online hate speech.
A revised section 13 would establish the communication of hate speech by means of Internet or any other means of telecommunication that is likely to foment detestation or vilification of an individual or group of individuals on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination as a discriminatory practice, and clarifies what types of communications and speech would fall within this provision.
This would replace the previously repealed section 13 that established hate messages communicated telephonically or by a telecommunication undertaking as a discriminatory practice.
Bill C-63 would introduce a series of amendments to the Act including:
Bill C-63 was introduced and completed First Reading on February 26, 2024. While the timeline for the Bill is uncertain, Second Reading, during which Parliamentarians will have their first opportunity to speak on the Bill in the House of Commons, is expected to begin soon. Stay tuned as we continue monitoring the progress of this important Bill.
To learn more about Bill C-63, please contact a member of our team.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.