Gemma Whittaker
Partner
Article
The Government has confirmed that the Building Safety Levy (the Levy) – which will be charged on all new dwellings and purpose-built student accommodation in England which require a building control application – will not now come into effect until Autumn 2026.
As we had previously reported, the Remediation Acceleration Plan published in December 2024 had set an implementation date of "Autumn 2025" for the Levy.
However, the Government response to the most recent consultation on the Levy (the Response) which closed in February 2024, now confirms that this will be pushed back to Autumn 2026. This is intended to give "local government, the Building Safety Regulator, and Registered Building Control Approvers around 18 months to prepare for the levy; and housing developers who will pay the levy around 18 months to factor levy cost into their financial planning."
The Response also notably confirms details of the Levy rates, and exclusions from the scope of the Levy.
We explore some of the key takeaways below.
The scope has been expanded since the Levy – which is defined in section 58 of the Building Safety Act 2022 (BSA) – was initially outlined in 2021, when it was envisaged that it would only apply to higher-risk buildings (HRBs).
A prior public consultation which ran from November 2022 to February 2023 confirmed that its scope would be extended to apply to all new residential buildings requiring building control approval (subject to certain exclusions, discussed below).
The latest Response now confirms that:
The Response also confirms further exclusions from the Levy for affordable housing, non-social homes built by not-for profit Registered Providers, NHS hospitals, supported housing, children’s homes, domestic abuse shelters, criminal justice and military accommodation, and care / nursing homes.
The Response contains, in Annex A, the applicable levy rates for each local authority area in England. These apply per square metre of chargeable floorspace (measured using Gross Internal Area (GIA), as set out in the RICS Code of Measuring Practice 6th Edition).
Communal areas will be subject to the levy charge, as despite several respondents – including the retirement sector – having lobbied for their exclusion, Government takes the view that they are for the use or benefit of occupants and so contribute to the value of the building.
The exact amount payable under the Levy will vary, depending on whether development is on previously developed land or not, and according to which local authority area the property is situated in.
The consultation response gives an example based on a development of 20 houses in Dover.
Below, we have provided a couple more examples, based on minimum GIAs under the nationally described space standard (in each case not including calculations for associated communal areas):
A two-double bedroom flat on previously developed land measuring 70 square metres.
A four-double bedroom house over two floors on land which has not previously been developed, measuring 124 square metres.
Full details of the collection process will be set out in the regulations and will be subject to approval by Parliament, but the Response indicates the intention for the provision of information to be split between application / initial notice stage and commencement stage.
It envisages that:
Failure to provide levy information will be added as a ground for the rejection of an application for building control approval or initial notice, to reduce the burden on LAs of chasing missing information.
The Response indicates that in most cases, the collecting authority will calculate the Levy amount within five weeks of the submission of the levy information accompanying the first commencement notice, and will issue the client and where applicable, the Registered Building Control Approver (RBCA) with a "notice of levy liability" or confirmation that the Levy is not applicable.
Regulations are also expected to state that a completion certificate must not be issued by the relevant building control authority (the LA or BSR for HRBss) (or for clients using a RBCA , the LA must reject any final certificate given) if the Levy has not been paid.
Although it has taken over a year to be published since the consultation closed in February 2024 (and noting the change in Government in the intervening period) the Response does provide some welcome clarity as to the scope of the Levy, the rates, the process for its collection and the types of developments which will be excluded.
Postponement of the implementation date will be welcomed by housebuilders and developers, who recently called on Government to reconsider plans for the Levy, in a joint letter sent by the Home Builders Federation (HBF). Government confirmed in a written statement on 24 March 2025 that the postponement was determined in order to "give the housing sector more time to adapt" as well as giving "housing developers who will pay the levy more time to factor levy costs into their plans".
Developers will however need to await publication of the regulations for detail of the trigger point for when developments currently in the pipeline will attract the Levy (currently expected to be based on the timing of submission of the building control application / initial notice, although this is not confirmed in the Response).
If you have any questions about this article, please get in touch with Gemma Whittaker.
To keep up to date with the latest news on the Building Safety Levy and other construction news, sign up to our newsletter.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.