Jian Xu
Managing Director
Head of IP Prosecution, China; IP Attorney, Patent and Trademark Attorney
Article
And the moves founders rarely make early enough
5
I hear this often from founders in sectors as diverse as consumer electronics, biotech, and SaaS. And I get it. Filing a trademark feels like checking the "China IP" box early.
But in reality, that box is part of a much bigger—and often more expensive—puzzle.
China doesn’t just require speed in filing. It demands strategy. The costs of getting it wrong aren’t always immediate, but when they show up, they often come in the form of:
Here are five of the most common blind spots I’ve seen and how you can avoid them while there’s still time.
Trademarks are essential but far from sufficient. Especially in China.
Most startups file their English brand name in one or two classes, then move on. But smart founders ask:
Case-in-point: A fast-growing wearables brand filed its core mark, but ignored its award-winning charger design and tagline. Local copycats quickly imitated the rest—legally.
Also: whether or not you use a Chinese version of your brand, securing key Chinese-language marks can still be a protective move. Even if your brand operates under an English name, local consumers—or bad actors—may assign Chinese nicknames. If you don't file them first, someone else might.
That said, the decision should be strategic, not automatic. There are nuanced pros and cons depending on your branding strategy and target demographics.
Startups sometimes assume that patents only matter for hardware companies, but in China, even product-focused SaaS and IoT firms often qualify for design or utility model protection, especially if they offer devices, user-facing products, or embedded systems.
In China, the patent system offers several fast and cost-effective tools founders can use:
True story: A smart home startup showed a prototype to a China-based manufacturer before filing any patent. Within six months, the factory filed a local patent for an identical product and began sales under its own brand.
Most founders think of code, visual assets, or user interfaces as protected by default.
That’s only half true.
In principle, China is a member of the Berne Convention, which means that foreign works are granted copyright protection without requiring local registration.
In practice, however, a China copyright recordal certificate can go a long way, especially when it comes to:
Real example: A SaaS platform discovered a cloned version of its interface in China that included menus, dashboards, even onboarding screens. But with no Chinese copyright registration, it experienced huge difficulties and delays with enforcement.
This one’s surprisingly common.
Many startups file China IP under:
Each option introduces ownership ambiguity that can slow down deals, scare off local partners, or raise red flags in diligence.
Tip: File under your primary operating entity in China, or an entity you control and can easily assign from. If you're a pre-China entity setup, consider a nominee structure or at least document a clear assignment path now, not later. Even early-stage startups should ask: “Who will commercialize this product in China? Through what legal entity?”
Too often, IP is seen as “defensive” and something lawyers handle to avoid lawsuits.
But for startups expanding into China, your IP is your leverage:
Example: A gaming startup used its Chinese copyright and character designs to license content to a local distributor, opening up a revenue stream no one on their team had considered during fundraising.
China is a high-reward, high-risk IP environment.
The good news? You don’t need to file everything. You just need to file intelligently and early enough to avoid lockouts, delays, or unwanted surprises.
By doing this, you’re not just protecting, you’re positioning your company to scale with confidence in one of the world’s most complex markets.
To start thinking about your Chinese IP strategy—or revitalize your existing strategy—get in contact with Jian Xu or a member of Gowling WLG’s Intellectual Property team.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.