P.A. Neena Gupta
Associée
Article
7
There have been clear indications that the Government of Canada does not want the Employment Insurance (EI) system to subsidize individuals who are terminated or put on leave due to a refusal to be vaccinated without medical or other valid reasons.
On October 21, 2021, Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion Carla Qualtrough indicated on CBC's Power& Politics that El policy is likely to be changed to preclude individuals who are terminated because of non-compliance with employer vaccine requirements. The interview signaled a hardening of government attitudes against the minority of Canadian workers who are not complying with employer vaccine requirements.
On October 15, 2021, the Government of Canada updated its bulletin to assist employers in issuing Records of Employment (ROE) documents during the COVID-19 pandemic, including when an employee's employment is disrupted due to non-compliance with a mandatory vaccination policy.[1] The bulletin's specific guidance on vaccine refusals should be read in light of Minister Qualtrough's interview regarding what she anticipated government EI policy will be. Together, they are a strong signal that EI benefits will not be available for vaccine refusals that do not have a medical or other Human Rights justification.
Block 16 of an ROE indicates the reason why the employee is not working. There are codes assigned to the most common reasons for issuing an ROE.[2] The Service Canada bulletin has clarified when the following codes are to be used in block 16 in the context of COVID-19:
Interestingly, where an employer uses either Codes E, N or M, Service Canada may contact the employer to inquire about the content and implementation of their COVID-19 policy. An employer may be asked whether:
Given this new guidance on ROE codes, employers can expect to be contacted by Service Canada if they suspend or terminate an employee relating to non-compliance with a workplace COVID-19 vaccination policy. Service Canada may then determine whether the terminated employee is entitled to Employment Insurance (EI). Generally, an employee terminated for cause is not entitled to EI.
Service Canada has provided additional clarification on how to code the reason for dismissal in the context of the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, the new guidance to employers on how to code an ROE for employees that have refused to comply with a mandatory vaccination policy suggests that Service Canada will be scrutinizing those employees' applications for EI benefits closely – and also that those applications could very well be denied.
Employers should be prepared to provide a copy of the COVID-19 policy and also the justification for that policy to Service Canada. Recommendations from local Medical Officers of Health, requests from Joint Health & Safety Committees, input from external safety consultants or a history of COVID-19 exposures in the workplace are all powerful evidence justifying vaccination policies.
Remember, an employer generally must issue the ROE within five days after an employee's last day of work. This is regardless of the reason the ROE is being issued, and whether or not an employee intends to apply for EI.
Service Canada's decision regarding the reason for the separation of employment and whether the employee is entitled to EI is based on the Employment Insurance Act and its Regulations. As such, a finding by Service Canada has no precedential impact on the legal determination of whether or not an employee was appropriately terminated for cause under the Employment Standards Act and under the common law.
For assistance in preparing and implementing a COVID-19 vaccination policy or questions about this article, please contact a member of Gowling WLG's Employment, Labour & Equalities group.
[1] https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/ei/ei-list/ei-roe/notice-covid-19.html
[2] For the full list of assigned codes, visit the government of Canada's webpage here: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/ei/ei-list/reports/roe-guide/instructions.html#block16
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.