Départ du personnel de R&D : à qui appartiennent les droits de propriété intellectuelle? (Article en anglais)

9 minutes de lecture
23 novembre 2021


This article was published in the November/December 2021 edition of "Electronic Products & Technology" magazine.

Let's imagine that you've hired a receptionist we'll call 'Aisha,' on an employ­ment contract appropriate for a full-time receptionist.

But Aisha gets inspired by your company's learning culture and pro­mote-from-within policies to build her technical skills. She starts doing work that supports the company's R&D efforts, in addition to her re­ceptionist duties. Soon, she's off the receptionist desk and doing R&D full time – so well that you've entrusted her with creating some key parts of your product's mechanism.

Aisha does such great work that one day she comes to you to say she's been headhunted away.

You're disappointed, but you're reassured that at least you have full ownership of the inventions she creat­ed while she was an employee of your company.

But maybe not. Maybe you'll find that in fact, Aisha owns the rights to her inventions. So, you find yourself negotiating to buy those rights from your ex-employee -- who's well aware of how important those inventions are, to your business.

All such situations are different, and dealing with them requires profession­al advice. But experience supporting employers in such situations prompts a question – what was in the employ­ment contract Aisha signed? And when she started doing R&D work, did she sign a new contract appropri­ate to her new role, which contained the appropriate assignments of IP to your company?

Contrary to what many people believe, the basic presumption in law is that the employee owns everything they create. Ownership will go to the company only if (a) there's a specific agreement with the employee saying that anything the employee invents of a specific type is going to be owned by the company, or (b) the employee was 'hired to innovate' – an inquiry that often results in a grey area which requires expensive assessment and resolution by a Court or arbitrator.

In the case of Aisha-the-receptionist, it would be appropriate to have a contract that discussed a reception-ist's duties. But, when she moved into her new role, it would have been best to examine that contract and see if it is appropriate to her new work. If it does not discuss matters appropriate to Aisha-the-inventor, it's essential to develop and have her sign a new contract appropriate to her new role.

In our experience, many companies miss this step – through lack of knowl­edge, or too many other priorities, or they are avoiding a discussion that might result in having to increase the employee's compensation.

Patents can introduce a particular kind of wrinkle into the issue of who owns an invention.

Even if your employee inventor is found to have co-invented the invention and therefore co-owns the patent, it is a real challenge in Can­ada to co-own a patent. Co-owners can independently make or sell the invention, without consent of other co-owners. They can license or assign their interest in the patent to another single party, so the new purchaser will become a co-owner.

Perhaps frustratingly, Canada's Patent Act is silent as to ownership of a patent in an employment context.

But the general presumption un­der common law is that employee (or an independent contractor) will own their invention and the result­ing patent made during course of employment or the relationship. This presumption applies in the absence of one of the two conditions applying, as referred to above:

  1. express agreement to the con­trary; or
  2. the employee was originally hired for the express purpose of innovating or inventing.

Canada's Copyright Act is slightly more helpful to employers than the Patent Act. If Aisha in the above situ­ation had skills in graphic design and made a new company logo, the Copy­right Act states that while Aisha would be the first author of the work, if she is "under a contract of service" to her employer, and the work was made in the course of her employment, the work will be owned by the employer. Even so, despite the Copyright Act, it is still way better and more certain to have ownership of such works to be spelled out in the employment agreement.

It is also very common for compa­nies to work with outside consultants to develop an app or some other software for the company. Software is protected by copyright. In the case of an outside consultant, it is ex­tra important to have an agreement in place that the code will be fully owned by the company. In this case, the author of the software would not be an employee, and would not likely be considered to be "under a contract of service" to the company, therefore it would be difficult to rely on the de­fault provisions of the Copyright Act.

Further to the issue of employees and IP, here are some pointers on confidentiality:

Make sure your employment agreement includes confidential­ity provisions, so your employees keep inventions secret. In many countries, if they get publicly disclosed, you may no longer obtain a patent for them. In some countries like Canada and the United States, patent protection will be possible only within a narrow window of one year from the disclosure, but in most other countries, your abilities to patent have been compromised.

Include a trade secret policy in your employment contracts. A trade secret is valuable business information that derives its com­mercial value from being kept secret. Trade secrets can also include inventions or designs that may become patented later. Be sure to address this import­ant asset in your employment contracts.

Have a set of policies and pro­cedures to categorize, record, and control access to trade secret information. Track who accesses trade secret information, when, and for how long. Be sure to use encryption when access is pro­vided. These practices minimize risk of trade secret thefts, but just as importantly, show that the company takes active measures to protect its trade secrets.

Limit access to only those who need it to carry out their duties. Trade secrets are often lost through theft by employees or third parties. It can be very easy for an employee to download company information onto a USB and walk out with it. When an employee leaves the company, or a contractor terminates their work, have them sign a certificate to confirm they have not used or taken any confidential informa­tion and will not in the future.

Learn how to dispose of con­fidential information properly. Professional outside services may be needed to delete digital trade secrets and physical copies.

Some further steps: Make sure that employee contracts are in place: There has been more than one case in which a start­up hired employees informally, without employment contracts. Depending on your company's history, it is wise to check the records for each employee to be sure that there is an employment agreement in place.

Keep employment contracts in tune with current roles: Whenever an employee is promoted or moves into a new role, see if their new duties match what's in their contract – particularly if that new role includes creating new IP. If so, draw it up - have them sign it.

Compensate employees separately for creations and in­ventions: Don't be grateful yet cheap. If an employee creates something valuable for the firm that is not in their job descrip­tion, make an agreement and purchase the asset, paying the employee separately from their usual salary. Such a practice will often incentivize other employ­ees to innovate.

Be able to prove the origin of work done on your company's behalf – including storing records centrally, and keeping control over who has access to them. This includes work done by employees and by 3rd-par­ty independent contractors brought in for a specific project.

Make an invention disclosure policy. This is a document often written by a scientist or engineer. They should be prepared close in time to when the invention was made, and updated if new improvements are added later. Emphasize in your policy that the company will own all inven­tions described in disclosures.

Compensate inventors for completing disclosure state­ments. You can also offer further compensation if you end up fil­ing for patent protection on that invention, or generating revenue from it.

Emphasize that any physical notebooks and lab books remain property of the firm – have your staff keep electronic records so that the details reside on compa­ny-owned equipment.

CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.