Matt Walker
Partner
Article
14
The Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023 (the Act), a mammoth piece of legislation over 500 pages long, was passed today. When first introduced into Parliament, it intended to support the Government's manifesto pledge to "level up" the United Kingdom by reversing geographical disparities between different parts of the country by spreading opportunities more equally. However, as it made its way through both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, it grew in scope and, as passed, could transform the environment in which the real estate market operates.
The Act sets out a framework allowing the Secretary of State (SOS) to make regulations requiring certain information to be provided to the Chief Land Registrar or anyone else exercising public functions on behalf of the Crown. Further legislation is therefore needed to bring the provisions into force, and there are currently no details as to what this will look like or when it might be brought forward – no doubt the devil will be in the detail.
The Act identifies three "permitted purposes" for which the SOS may require disclosure as detailed below.
Information will be within the beneficial ownership purpose if it would be useful for:
Broadly, a person will be considered a beneficial owner if the legal title is held:
and in either case the person is a beneficial owner in relation to that body corporate, partnership, trust, etc.
The first element looks to the beneficial ownership of the entity, which owns the legal estate in the land. Where this entity is already listed on a regulated market, subject to the obligations in the people with significant control (PSC) register, or registered on the Register of Oversees Entities, this information will already be in the public domain.
The second limb includes trusts. Most express trusts are registered on the Trust Registration Service (TRS). However, the TRS is not public – by bringing the beneficiaries of a trust of land into the public domain, the Act may bring land held by UK trustees into line with land held by overseas trustees. We won't know how this will work until the regulations are published (e.g. whether it will be registration at the Land Registry which will make it essentially mandatory or whether it will be something else). In relation to land held by overseas trustees, the beneficial owners of that land (as opposed to the beneficial owners of the overseas entity itself) will become registrable on the Register of Overseas Entities as part of changes to the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.
Information is within the contractual control purpose if the SOS considers it useful for understanding relevant contractual rights, including identifying the persons holding them and the circumstances in which they were created. Relevant contractual rights are ones that:
Information is within the scope of the national security purpose if it appears that:
Assuming it falls into one of the permitted purposes, the information that may have to be provided includes transactional information about contracts and other arrangements which create, change, terminate, evidence or transfer interests or rights in land. The definition is very broadly drawn and could conceivably include sale contracts, agreements for lease, options, pre-emption agreements, lock-out agreements, promotion agreements, development agreements, forward funding agreements, share sale agreements for property-owning special purpose vehicles (SPV) and more. We will need to wait and see what the regulations specify.
Transactional information will include:
The Act authorises regulations which may provide for both:
We will need to wait for the regulations to be published but it must be assumed that at least some of this information may find its way into the public domain.
The Act specifically authorises regulations that may relate to things done or arising before the Act comes into force. Again, the detail in the regulations will be key, but it seems likely that the Government will cast its net as widely as possible.
There will be two main methods of enforcement:
Overall the Act seriously reduces the extent to which market players can keep ownership and transactional information confidential. By making it harder to keep details of property transactions, property rights and interests and land ownership and control private, the Act may alter how the property market has historically worked.
Another aspect of the Act which may prove controversial is its aim to bring into re-use vacant high street premises through a rental auction orchestrated by the local authority. These provisions apply in England but not in Wales.
The new regime will apply to commercial premises (other than premises last used as a warehouse, which are specifically exempt) which satisfy the following criteria:
After the auction and a minimum of six weeks after the final letting notice (but before it expires), the local authority may enter into a tenancy agreement with the successful bidder under which the landlord agrees to grant a short-term tenancy.
The Act provides that a tenancy contract entered into in this way has the effect as if it was entered into by the landlord. The tenancy itself is to be granted by the landlord – if the landlord does not do so the local authority has the power to grant the tenancy itself. Both the tenancy contract and the tenancy are deemed to have been entered into with the express consent of any superior landlord or lender.
The term of the tenancy, which will be excluded from the security of tenure provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, must be between one and five years. It is unclear how the rent under the tenancy will be determined – presumably it will happen via the auction process itself.
The tenancy contract may include provisions requiring the landlord to carry out pre-tenancy works and may allow the tenant into occupation to carry out works. In deciding the terms of the contract, the local authority must have regard to any representations made by the landlord.
A person interested in the land will be entitled to compensation from the local authority for any damage caused as a result of the exercise of the power to enter and survey the premises. However, no compensation is payable in respect of the power to auction the property because it appears that the landlord will be able to retain the rent paid under the tenancy.
It will be interesting to gauge the reaction of local authorities to the auction process. Will there be the appetite, capacity and/or the budget within local authorities to action it? The procedures do not appear easy to operate and involve tight time limits at every stage.
High street premises remain vacant for a number of reasons, including business rates and changing consumer behaviour. Even if local authorities are anxious to engage with the process, it isn't clear that there will be many willing potential tenants. Will tenants want to begin a landlord and tenant relationship with someone who was not directly involved in selecting them to occupy their space?
It seems likely that landlords may choose to avoid premises being vacant by entering into short-term lettings. While this may reduce the number of unoccupied premises, the lettings may not be to tenants who are desirable to the landlord or the local area. It may also push landlords towards repurposing their commercial premises for residential use.
We will have to wait for specific regulations to detail the many uncertainties in the Act in order to assess its impact on the real estate market.
The Act also makes important changes to planning law - look out for further updates from our planning and environment team.
To discuss any of the points raised in this article, please contact Matt Walker or Salwa Ali.
You can also view our previous insight: Levelling up or opening up? Looking at what the Bill sets out and the contractual purpose.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.