Sharon Ayres
Partner
Article
5
A lot of information has been published recently about the requirement for directors to have their identity verified under the new ECCTA requirements. But the detail relating to persons with significant control (PSCs), who are also subject to compulsory identity verification, is a little more obscure. They are also subject to compulsory identity verification and the timing for that exercise is also underway as from 18 November 2025.
In this latest article in our ‘Understanding the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA)’ series, we build on our earlier articles covering directors and LLP members to focus on the requirement for PSCs.
The UK’s PSC regime, introduced in 2016, established a framework requiring companies and LLPs to identify PSCs, and notify their details to Companies House. PSCs themselves have been under a legal obligation to notify the company or LLP as soon as they become aware of their status. These measures were designed to increase transparency and combat financial crime.
Previously Companies House did not independently verify PSC information, meaning that the system largely relied on a PSC self-reporting and honesty. ECCTA aims to strengthen the reliability of the Companies House Register by ensuring PSC information is verified, reducing the risk of abuse.
The compulsory identity verification (IDV) regime applies to PSCs as well as company directors and LLP members and requires the individuals to verify their identity at Companies House by providing certain personal information and supporting identity documents such as passport or driving licence. Once verified, the individuals receive a unique personal identification code (PIC) from Companies House. This code must be used to link the individual to each company or LLP which they are PSC of, and for future filings and confirmations.
Companies House is moving from being a passive to an active gatekeeper, vetting those who control companies and consequently increasing the reliability of the information that they hold.
A more detailed explanation of how individuals can verify their identity is given in our earlier briefing, Understanding ECCTA: identity verification.
As with directors and LLP members covered in earlier articles, PSCs face phased implementation of the compulsory IDV requirements, with specific deadlines depending on whether they are newly appointed or already registered.
The verification requirements became compulsory from 18 November 2025, with phased implementation for existing directors, LLP members and PSCs. The requirements for PSCs (whether of a company or LLP) are as follows:
If a person becomes a PSC after 18 November 2025, the PIC must be supplied at the time the PSC is notified to Companies House.
The process for existing PSCs is slightly more complex,
Notification is done via a new online service at Companies House, either by the PSC themselves or someone on their behalf. Note that there does not appear to be a hard copy form for making the notification. Provided it is made within the deadline, the PSC may use the online service, on up to two occasions, to request a 14 day extension of the time period for notification.
Although IDV only needs to be done once, the PIC needs to be notified for each company or LLP, which will mean using the online service on multiple occasions and at different times.
The details required for notification are, thankfully, quite simple:
If the IDV requirements are not complied with, the individual PSC may be committing an offence and must pay a financial penalty or fine. A note will also be made against the individual's name on the public register.
Companies and LLPs which have a relevant legal entity (RLE) as its PSC will need to designate one of its directors or LLP members as its ‘relevant officer’, whose identity must be verified. Companies House must be notified of that appointment, and also of any change in the particulars of the relevant officer. The purpose of these provisions is to ensure that there is always a verified individual who is traceable for the RLE. These provisions are not yet in force, they are expected in Spring 2026, but no specific date has been set yet.
Selecting the 'relevant officer' is a further step in closing-off a transparency gap by adding an individual to represent and hold some responsible for corporate RLEs.
Also under ECCTA, Companies House has significant new powers to query, investigate and challenge information held on the public register. Where there are doubts about the accuracy or authenticity of information it may formally query the company's position.
We are starting to see Companies House use this proactive power by sending out letters where they believe there may be a discrepancy on the PSC register, asking the company for evidence to substantiate its position as regards the identity of a PSC. Failure to respond within 14 days is a criminal offence and may result in financial penalties or prosecution.
This power supports Companies House's role of being an active gatekeeper, vetting those who control companies and consequently increasing the reliability of the information that they hold.
If you would like to discuss these changes and how they will impact your business, please contact Sharon Ayres, Caroline Williams or your usual Gowling WLG contact.
For more insights on ECCTA reforms, see our full Understanding ECCTA series.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.