Maggie Sainty
Avocate
Article
6
The employment law landscape in Ontario saw several legislative changes and case law developments over the past year. As we approach the end of Q1 2026, this overview highlights key updates from 2025, along with recurring annual requirements, to help employers maintain compliance throughout the year ahead.
The enforceability of termination clauses remains one of the most litigated areas of Ontario employment law. The case law trends establish that employment contracts are interpreted differently from commercial agreements to protect employees, who typically possess less bargaining power. Below we highlight a couple cases that came out this year, underscoring the changing landscape.
In Chan v. NYX Capital Corp., 2025 ONSC 4561, the termination clause was unenforceable because it purported to allow termination "at any time and for any reason at its discretion, without notice." The Court held that under the ESA, an employer does not have an absolute right to dismiss an employee, for instance, section 74 prohibits dismissal in reprisal for exercising ESA rights. The "for cause" provision also improperly used broad "cause" language rather than the ESA standard. This case is currently under appeal in 2026 and Gowling WLG will provide an update with the latest developments.
Conversely, carefully drafted clauses can withstand scrutiny. In Bertsch v. Datastealth Inc., 2025 ONCA 379, the Court of Appeal upheld a clause expressly limiting entitlements to "only the minimum payments and entitlements, if any, owed to you under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000." The Court found this "unambiguous" and the agreement included a "failsafe" provision ensuring minimum ESA entitlements.
If you are unsure if your employment contracts will withstand recent case law trends, Gowling WLG is available to help you navigate the evolving common law landscape.
As a reminder, in 2021 and 2022 respectively, the ESA was amended requiring employers with 25 or more employees in Ontario to develop and publish two new policies: Disconnecting from Work, and Electronic Monitoring. The 25-employee threshold is triggered on January 1 of each year, and employers who hit this threshold must have these policies in place no later than March 1 of that year. Employers who met the threshold in previous years and have published these policies still have ongoing obligations to ensure that:
Disconnecting from Work policies must set out how the employer manages an employee’s ability to “Disconnect from work” which is defined under the ESA as “not engaging in work-related communications, including emails, telephone calls, video calls or sending or reviewing other messages, to be free from the performance of work.” Note that the requirement to have such a policy does not create a right to disconnect on the part of any employee and therefore, these policies need to be drafted carefully so as not to unintentionally create a contractual term limiting employee work requirements.
Electronic Monitoring policies must list all systems used by the employer that have the ability to monitor employee activity electronically. Examples include: software data collection/tracking, GPS, timecard systems, building/room access cards. Every time an employer changes their electronic monitoring systems—whether by deactivating or activating—the policy must be updated detailing the change in systems and the date of the amendments to the policy.
The developments of 2025 have made one thing clear for employers in Ontario: staying static is no longer a viable compliance strategy. These changes underscore the importance of reviewing and updating recruitment, recordkeeping, policies, employment agreements, and site management practices regularly.
Our firm is closely monitoring the legislative, judicial, and related regulatory developments. If your business requires assistance in preparing for compliance, navigating worker-related enforcement actions, or responding to OINP changes, please do not hesitate to reach out to a member of our Employment, Labour and Equalities Group.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.
Gowling WLG est un cabinet juridique international constitué des membres de Gowling WLG International Limited, une société à responsabilité limitée par garanties enregistrée en Angleterre, ainsi que leurs affiliés respectifs. Les membres et affiliés constituent des entités autonomes et indépendantes. Gowling WLG International Limited promeut, facilite et coordonne les activités de ses membres, mais ne fournit pas elle-même de services aux clients. Pour en savoir davantage sur notre structure, consultez notre page Avis juridique.
© 2026 Gowling WLG Tous droits réservés