Jocelyn S Paulley
Partner
Co-leader of Data Protection and Cyber Security sector (UK)
Article
5
Data centres have been the subject of much attention from government and policy over the last few years - whether being recognised as critical national infrastructure, driving grid connection reform, breaking into the nationally significant infrastructure projects category or as the infrastructure for establishing the UK as an artificial intelligence (AI) global power.
The latest focus comes from a different angle – sustainability. Whilst data centres deliver great capacity for IT workloads that support cloud computing and AI (which in turn form the basis of all systems used by enterprise, healthcare, education, finance transport, government etc), those facilities have impacts on the environment and sustainability. They consume electricity in great quantities, use water (to varying different degrees), produce excess heat and require a physical footprint.
The Environmental Audit Committee's (EAC) new call for evidence into the environmental impact of data centres reminds all those invested in the sector that future development must meet sustainability objectives whilst delivering commercial demand.
The inquiry reflects a wider shift in how policymakers view digital infrastructure. Data centres are recognised as critical national assets, but also as major users of energy and water whose environmental footprint must be aligned with the UK's net‑zero commitments.
Forecasts from the National Energy System Operator indicate that electricity consumption from data centres could quadruple by 2030. Ofgem has also highlighted that around 140 proposed schemes could collectively require up to 50 GW of power, exceeding Great Britain's current peak demand. These figures are shifting the policy narrative. Data centre growth is increasingly being assessed as part of national energy planning, rather than as isolated local developments.
Against that backdrop, the EAC will consider:
This is more than a technical review. It signals that environmental performance is likely to become a more prominent factor in planning decisions, grid access and wider public acceptance. We have already seen that start to play out with the planning permission at the Iver hyperscale facility like to be revoked due to failure to secure and implement the environmental mitigations that had meant the project was not an Environmental Impact Assessment development. If that permission is revoked, the project will likely be set back two years.
The government has to manage two competing objectives: on one hand, to provide incentives for AI to flourish in the UK (be that through nurturing AI suppliers, making AI computing available to our researchers or enabling deployment by UK plc), but on the other hand, to meet its sustainability targets across climate change, decarbonisation, reducing emissions and water usage.
Operators, developers and investors are all alive to the need to source renewable energy as much as possible to power their facilities. That in itself is a challenge – renewable energy is not produced in the areas where facilities are typically sited and is not smooth and reliable enough to power sophisticated data centres with complex systems. Even if renewable energy was a readily available solution, the sheer scale of the predicted energy requirement is possibly large to be met by any renewable source other than nuclear. Other sustainability initiatives are not easy to co-ordinate in a country like the UK with space constraints and aging infrastructure, such as heat waste re-use in local heat networks.
The other balancing factor is whether the use of AI by consumers, enterprise and government will actually result in the energy consumption predictions being made by National Energy System Operator (NESO) and investors alike.
Whilst there are many variables and unknowns at play, what is becoming clear is that government will not incentivise data centre development at any cost – it must align with, and achieve, the nation's environmental goals.
Operators, developers and investors should:
Viewed positively, the call for evidence presents an opportunity for the sector to help shape a policy developments that support both sustainability and long‑term digital infrastructure growth.
The EAC call for evidence is open until 6 April 2026.
We will continue to monitor the inquiry closely and share further insights as policy, planning and energy considerations evolve across the data centre landscape. Sign up to our mailing list to receive our latest datacentre and infrastructure updates and ensure you're prepared for what's ahead.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.
Gowling WLG est un cabinet juridique international constitué des membres de Gowling WLG International Limited, une société à responsabilité limitée par garanties enregistrée en Angleterre, ainsi que leurs affiliés respectifs. Les membres et affiliés constituent des entités autonomes et indépendantes. Gowling WLG International Limited promeut, facilite et coordonne les activités de ses membres, mais ne fournit pas elle-même de services aux clients. Pour en savoir davantage sur notre structure, consultez notre page Avis juridique.
© 2026 Gowling WLG Tous droits réservés