Ian Chapman-Curry
Legal Director
PSL legal director
Balados
7
There are circumstances in which a defined benefit pension scheme may have a funding surplus. In episode 12 of Pensions in 30 Podcasts, we look at the challenges of refunding surplus, both on wind-up and in an ongoing scheme.
Employers have a number of legal obligations to support their occupational pension scheme. In a defined benefit (DB) pension scheme, the sponsoring employer will usually agree with the trustee the level of contributions it is required to make in order to fund the scheme to a level that will allow it to meet its liabilities. Most DB schemes have a funding deficit and so a recovery plan is put in place and the employer will make additional deficit reduction contributions.
Occasionally a DB scheme may have a funding surplus, for example, where a scheme's investments exceed expectations for a number of years. Where this occurs an employer will be keen to ensure that any excess contributions it has paid to the scheme can be returned.
Until 6 April 2006, if a pension scheme had a surplus the trustees were required to eliminate that surplus. One way to do this was to repay the surplus to the employer. Certain requirements must have been met before the surplus could be repaid, including the requirement to apply a specific increase to all pension benefits.
The obligation to eliminate a surplus was removed on 6 April 2006 (under the Finance Act 2004) as a result of tax simplification measures to remove out-dated HMRC restrictions on over-funding of pension schemes. A refund of surplus to an employer is still permitted, but only if certain legislative requirements are met. The requirements differ, depending on whether the scheme is ongoing or in wind-up.
For an ongoing scheme set up prior to 6 April 2006, the requirements include:
Section 251 of the Pensions Act 2004 provides that any pension scheme with a power to return surplus to an employer will lose that power unless the trustees pass a resolution to retain it by 5 April 2016 (this deadline was extended from 6 April 2011). Any such resolution must meet the specific requirements of section 251.
Where there is no power to pay a refund of surplus in the rules of the scheme the power cannot be added unless the scheme's power of amendment is wide enough to permit this. If the power of amendment prohibits such a change the power cannot be added and the surplus cannot be paid to the employer.
But in any event, a resolution would have had to be made as above.
Where the Trustees of an ongoing scheme pay a refund of surplus they are required to notify The Pensions Regulator of the payment within one week of making it.
Note that for schemes set up after the introduction of Pensions Act 2004, Section 251 does not apply and it is still possible for a payment to an employer from scheme funds without a Section 251 resolution.
The legislative requirements for a refund of surplus to an employer where a scheme is in wind-up include:
The notice given to the members of a scheme in wind-up must invite them to make representations in relation to the proposal to the Trustees, the employer, or ultimately to The Pensions Regulator if the member does not consider that the legislative requirements are met. The Pensions Regulator may issue a notice to the Trustees or the employer that the payment must not be made until it has confirmed it is satisfied that the legislative requirements are met.
A refund of surplus payment from an occupational pension scheme (including both an ongoing scheme and a scheme in wind-up) will attract a 35% tax charge, payable by the Trustees (as the administrators of the scheme). This is a free standing tax charge and so no off-sets can be made from it. The Trustees should deduct the tax charge from the surplus payment before it is paid.
CECI NE CONSTITUE PAS UN AVIS JURIDIQUE. L'information qui est présentée dans le site Web sous quelque forme que ce soit est fournie à titre informatif uniquement. Elle ne constitue pas un avis juridique et ne devrait pas être interprétée comme tel. Aucun utilisateur ne devrait prendre ou négliger de prendre des décisions en se fiant uniquement à ces renseignements, ni ignorer les conseils juridiques d'un professionnel ou tarder à consulter un professionnel sur la base de ce qu'il a lu dans ce site Web. Les professionnels de Gowling WLG seront heureux de discuter avec l'utilisateur des différentes options possibles concernant certaines questions juridiques précises.