P.A. Neena Gupta
Partner
Article
6
The issue of workplace sexual harassment and assault was one of the pivotal points in the U.S. election. This illustrates the sea change in attitudes about sexual harassment since the author joined the workplace over thirty-five years ago, when young female professionals were expected to cope with groping and sexist comments. On the flip side, her daughter has started her working life in a country with a gender-balanced cabinet and expects to be treated with respect.
Not surprisingly, Ontario's laws are trying to catch up to the changing times.
On Sept. 8, 2016, Bill 132 brought in sweeping changes to the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act and required employers to be proactive about and responsive to complaints about sexual harassment.
Is your business compliant? Sadly, most Ontario businesses aren't.
Here's a handy workplace harassment checklist that we've developed for our clients.
(a) Engaging in a course of vexatious comment or conduct against a worker in a workplace because of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression, where the course of comment or conduct is known or ought reasonably to be known to be unwelcome, or
(b) Making a sexual solicitation or advance where the person making the solicitation or advance is in a position to confer, grant or deny a benefit or advancement to the worker and the person knows or ought reasonably to know that the solicitation or advance is unwelcome.
When a complaint is received, an employer is expected to investigate the complaint fairly and completely. People need to be trained on investigating complaints and the law of workplace harassment. Make sure your investigator - internal or external - is competent and impartial.
One of the perennial complaints is that the process of complaint investigation and resolution takes too long. The expectation is that most complaints will be investigated and the results communicated within 90 days. While the time period is not a legislative requirement, it clearly sets out the expectation of the parties.
The employer's choice of investigator is not final. One of the most significant changes to OHSA under Bill 132 is that the Ministry of Labour can order that a complaint be investigated by an impartial third party at the expense of the employer.
While we anticipate that this power will be used sparingly and only when the employer's response is inadequate, this is a significant change. Employers can no longer sweep complaints under the proverbial carpet.
This article was written by P.A. Neena Gupta with the assistance of Katelyn Weller. Ms. Gupta and Ms. Weller are lawyers at the international law firm Gowling WLG. Both work within the firm's Employment, Labour & Equalities Group.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.