Ian Weatherall
Partner
Finance and Insolvency Litigation Specialist
Article
11
Once proceedings have been issued, the claim form must be served correctly within a specified period to ensure that the claim is properly brought to the defendant's attention. The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Parts 6 and 7 set out the relevant provisions for service of proceedings. Here we look at the top 10 questions that arise when serving proceedings within the jurisdiction.
Generally, in commercial claims, the claimant's solicitors serve the claim form, not the court. Where a claim has been issued through CE filing in the Rolls Building then the claimant (or its solicitor) must serve it unless the court orders otherwise. Claims in the TCC (along with all other documents) must be served by the claimant (or its solicitor).
A claim form to be served within the jurisdiction is valid for a period of four calendar months from issue. CPR 6.3 sets out the various methods of service available. CPR 7.5 sets out the steps (according to the particular method of service chosen) that a claimant must complete before 12.00 midnight on the calendar day four months after the date of issue of the claim form to effect service.
This process is known as 'despatching' the claim form and the steps required are set out in the table below.
Method of service | Step required |
---|---|
First class post, document exchange or other service which provides for delivery on the next business day | Posting, leaving with, delivering to or collection by the relevant service provider |
Delivery of the document to or leaving it at the relevant place | Delivering to or leaving the document at the relevant place |
Personal service under CPR 6.5 | Completing the relevant step required by CPR 6.5(3) |
Fax | Completing the transmission of the fax |
Other electronic method | Sending the e-mail or other electronic transmission |
It is the despatching of the claim form, not the receipt of it by the defendant or the deemed date of service (see 5 below), that must take place within the four month validity period to ensure that service is effected in accordance with the rules.
When serving by fax or other electronic means, the necessary consents - implied or express - need to have been obtained (PD 6A.4).
CPR 6.9 provides for default addresses for service where an address for service has not been provided by the defendant and personal service is not required. Depending upon the entity being sued, the default address is an address connected to a defendant's residence (if an individual), place of business, principal office or where a company carries on its activities.
Service on an individual (even if being sued in the name of a business or a partnership) at such an address will be good unless the claimant believes that the defendant no longer resides or carries on business at the default address. In such instances, the claimant must then take reasonable steps to ascertain the defendant's current residence or place of business. The defendant can then be served at that current address.
If no current address can be ascertained, and there is no alternative place or method for service available, the claimant can serve on the default address and service will be deemed to be good.
Yes. Pursuant to CPR 6.7, a claim form must be served on a defendant's solicitor where:
Without such notification, service upon the defendant's solicitor will not be valid.
Under CPR 6.14, the claim form is deemed served - so treated as having arrived - on the second business day after despatch, regardless of whether it has in fact arrived or not. The deemed date of service sets the timetable for the next steps in the proceedings - such as acknowledgement of service - and has no impact on when service is actually effected as per 2 above.
No. Parties can contractually agree the method and place of service for claims arising under the contract. The Companies Act 2006 (CA) also provides for methods of service on a company. Care should be taken to ensure service is effected in accordance with the contractual provisions or under the CA as the service provisions under the CPR will not necessarily apply or be implied.
Yes. The claimant can apply to extend time for service under CPR 7.6 within the four month period of validity and, in limited circumstances, after that period has expired. The court does not grant extensions lightly and this is particularly so for retrospective applications once the four month period has expired. In such a case, the claimant must have taken all reasonable steps to have effected service (but failed) and have made the application under CPR 7.6 promptly. As such applications are made without notice to the potential defendant any order granted is vulnerable to appeal following service of the claim form which must be accompanied by the order extending time.
The parties can also agree (in writing) to extend time but the claimant will bear any risk that the court might subsequently find that agreement to be ineffective.
Yes. The court can order service by an alternative method, or at an alternative place, or that steps already taken to bring the claim form to the defendant's attention by an alternative method or at an alternative place amount to good service (CPR 6.15). However, to succeed on such an application, there has to be good reason why service according to the usual methods cannot be undertaken. Unexplained delay in attempting to effect service and insufficient steps to ascertain a current address will not suffice. In exceptional circumstances the court can dispense with service altogether (CPR 6.16). Again, such orders are susceptible to being set aside on application by the defendant.
If the claim form is not despatched within the four month period (or any extension(s) of time obtained) then:
The particulars of claim can be contained in or served with the claim form or can be served within 14 days after service of the claim form (CPR 7.4). The particulars must, however, be served no later than the latest time for serving the claim form - so four calendar months from issue for claims served within the jurisdiction - unless there has been an agreement with the defendant, or order of the court, extending the time for service. If served as a separate document, even with the claim form, the particulars of claim may well have a different deemed date of service to the claim form so don't get caught out serving it outside the four month period or any extended time.
The court has very little sympathy where mistakes are made with service, especially where service is left to the end of the service period and particularly when issue of the claim form itself was left to the end of the underlying limitation period.
Claimants should:
And for defendants:
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.