Karina Labelle
Associate
Article
The Canadian construction industry is experiencing a notable shift toward more collaborative and outcome-driven project delivery models. At the forefront of this evolution is the Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) model—an innovative approach that emphasizes early stakeholder involvement, transparent communication, and the equitable sharing of risks and rewards.
To support this industry shift, in 2018 the Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) introduced the CCDC 30 – Integrated Project Delivery Contract. In June 2025, the CCDC released its first updated version of the CCDC 30, in response to extensive stakeholder feedback as well as to reflect developing industry practices and recent legislative developments.
This article examines the core principles of the IPD model, outlines the structure and intent of the CCDC 30, and highlights key updates introduced in the 2025 revision. It is intended to give construction industry stakeholders and legal professionals a practical overview of the contract’s maturation and its implications for IPD standards in Canada. Terms defined in the CCDC 30 are used in this article.
IPD represents a significant paradigm shift from traditional construction project delivery models. Unlike conventional methods, where design and construction are often sequential and disconnected, IPD brings together the owner, consultant, contractor, and where appropriate, key trade contractors and suppliers, to collaborate under a single, multi-party agreement from the project’s inception.
This integrated structure aligns participants’ interests, fostering a culture of collaboration, transparency, and shared accountability. The result is a more transparent and innovative process that aims to deliver enhanced value to the owner by achieving timely and cost-effective project completion, while reducing adversarial dynamics and inefficiencies.
At the core of IPD are several key principles:
The June 2025 amendments to the CCDC 30 introduce a series of targeted enhancements aimed at improving clarity, flexibility, and alignment with core IPD principles. These updates reflect the lessons learned from practical application, respond directly to stakeholder feedback, and incorporate recent legislative developments. Key changes include:
Successfully implementing a project under the CCDC 30 requires more than executing the agreement; it demands a sustained commitment to the principles of IPD and a disciplined approach to its processes.
Signing the contract at the beginning of the relationship, rather than at the conclusion of the Validation Phase, ensures all participants are aligned under the IPD framework from the outset and can fully engage in shaping the project's foundation. The Validation Phase should be approached with the necessary investment of time and resources, as this is where the groundwork for project success is laid.
Fostering a collaborative culture is essential, including actively cultivating an environment involving the cultivation of mutual trust, respect, and open communication. Teams should embrace lean principles and consider engaging an IPD Advisor to support alignment and reinforce collaborative behaviours, especially if the team lacks experience with IPD.
Careful selection of the project governance structure is also crucial to ensure timely and effective execution. Both the PMT and senior management team (SMT) should be composed of individuals with the authority to make decisions and bind their respective organizations.
Throughout the project, parties should make full use of the CCDC 30’s conflict management framework—a structured, tiered approach that prioritizes resolution at the PMT level and escalates to the SMT only when necessary. By addressing disagreements early and collaboratively, the parties can maintain project momentum, preserve the integrity of the IPD Team, and minimize disruptions.
By adhering to these best practices, participants can better position themselves to realize the benefits of the CCDC 30 and increase the likelihood of delivering projects that meet or exceed expectations.
Staying current with emerging standards, legislative changes, and market practices is essential. At Gowling WLG, we closely monitor developments across the construction sector, including updates to CCDC contracts, provincial legislation, and relevant case law. Our team brings deep experience in advising clients on the negotiation and implementation of CCDC contracts, as well as in developing tailored construction agreements that reflect the unique needs of each project.
If you have any questions about this article, the new CCDC contracts or any other construction contract matter, please contact the authors or a member of Gowling WLG's Infrastructure and Construction Group, or subscribe to our Building Brief newsletter to stay informed.
For further insights into the changes to the 2025 CCDC construction management contracts, CCDC 5A, 17, and 5B, please refer to the following article: Updates to the 2025 CCDC Construction Management Contracts: What you need to know.
NOT LEGAL ADVICE. Information made available on this website in any form is for information purposes only. It is not, and should not be taken as, legal advice. You should not rely on, or take or fail to take any action based upon this information. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking legal advice because of something you have read on this website. Gowling WLG professionals will be pleased to discuss resolutions to specific legal concerns you may have.